[jrisby]

Originally Posted by km8 I suspect the word Jrisby was thinking of was "Blackmail". But of course that's also illegal so let's not argue about it. That said, I'm open to persuasion on the "If you mention my site, it should be a link" argument. To make an offline parallel, if the Independent says "a report in The Times says ..." no right thinking person would expect the Independent to include a copy of The Times, or even to tell the reader where to find a copy of The Times. So why should a website that mentions another have to provide a link to that other site? Am I missing something? Is that an unfair comparison?

Hi km8.

Not quite sure what you mean there? I don't want our site linked to or mentioned from his site. He was misleading people that he had vouchers for our site when none existed which is why I asked him to stop. He responded (after months) by putting up the rubbish mentioned earlier. Totally unprofessional imho.