Six possible reasons off the top of my head:
If competitors can /are bidding on the brand name as well - having more bidders for your brand means you get more results.
If the brand name has a generic appeal as well, like "hoover", or "red letter day".
If the in-house ppc budget is exceeded by the possible daily expenditure, meaning that sometimes the in-house ads won't appear.
If a PPC partner is simply better at it than your in-house team, generating better conversion rates and ROI.
If the people in the closed group are also the top affiliates for generic terms as well.
A certain PPC person who I kidnapped in Barbados (you know who I mean) told me that the sad truth is that brand bidding is lucrative and easy, and a lot of affiliates/agencies only do generics to keep the merchant happy while they rake it in off brands - stop them branding and they'll probably stop the generics as well.
If a PPC partner is prepared to take you to search engines which your in-house team don't target - I'd say being promoted on MSN, ask, yahoo etc could be worth a compromise on Google.
A couple of the reasons depend on there being no agreement with Google to block the keyword, but surprisingly few merchants (imo) have done that anyway.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks