Its a fair point but I
am endlessly fascinated by how "hurt" people seem to be when the people they work with dont place them on a pedestal and bend over backwards. It reminds me of people who, when turned away from a nightclub, say "dont you know who I
am?!".
Just to play devils advocate for a min

... Lets throw the argument the other way... is it really that much of a hassle for you to sign up to the programme again when you are actually in a position to get it running, are you really above the minutes that this will take?
As a compulsivly organised person I can relate to them wanting to clear out the inactive accounts. They probably know from experience that 99% of people who sign up and do nothing for 4 months arent really that motivated. I bet there are loads of dreamers around who plan these amazing sites and never follow through (like me for example lol

!). Those in the 1% wo'nt be troubled by the massive hardship(?) of reapplying. Afterall, if the programme is good and you feel you can make money from it - surely its in your interest as well as theirs. If you end up ignoring it or signing up to a less good programme on this basis then you are cutting your nose off to spite your face - something I have very little time for. Pride is a sin afterall

!
I dont mean to be antagonistic, I
am just genuinly suprised at how many threads like this there are. Is it really that unreasonable?
Am I missing something? Is there a cost to reapplying for example?
Its just good housekeeping. Maybe their system is managed by one poor guy and a spreadsheet

! Dont be so hurt, chin up old chap

!
GL!