juxtaposition
jux·ta·po·si·tionPronunciation[juhk-stuh-puh-zish-uhn] Pronunciation Key
–noun
1. an act or instance of placing close together or side by side, esp. for comparison or contrast.
2. the state of being close together or side by side.
Kier, re negatives, I think what is being said is they shouldn't be allowed full stop, if they are then the merchant should define exactly what is considered misspellings which and any point could be interpreted by the individual with different views.
DisclaimerThis communication contains information which is confidential and/or maybe privileged. All information contained herein is without prejudice.Blog Moose On The Loose.
ContentNow.co.uk - Content Writing and Link Building services | Read my blog here | Follow me on Twitter
There is that, but a merchant shouldn't be put off entering affiliate marketing if they think they have to specify all this. If a new merchant (wrongly, I hope!) thinks that the affiliate industry is full of sharks who want to exploit every loophole they can it could put them off, and we're back to people who think that affiliates are "grubby" again.
I can imagine a spreadsheet of hundreds of entries that several programmes would want to cover all their brand mis-spellings.
I agree with Kieron's point over the page...
I'd expect the affiliates that I deal with to understand what a mis-spelling is and isn't, and would be happy to clarify if they are unsure.
Now with NEW! SHORTER! SIGNATURE!
If I post at funny hours, it's cos I'm in Oz!
Yes but they are about different aspects of the same issue: how clear T&Cs should be and by what means merchants should regulate affiliate acitivity, whether by listing in detail everything you can and can't bid on, whether by giving general guidelines and hoping they can be adhered to, or whether by specifying that certain keywords should be put in as negative on your campaigns etc.
I guess the two give maybe a good opportunity for a third thread namely what is best practice for regulating affiliate activity and what are the most effective and acceptable means of doing so.
Tesko is a hypothetical example, Tesko is another brand ie Tesko Laser's
So with tesco finance bidding on the misspell
tesko - Google Search
are they not bidding on somebody elses brand or is google contextually broadmatching assuming that the user wanted the misspell ... where do you draw the line,. You don't have to bid on a brand to appear for that brand. It's not black & white anymore, since you can sometimes bid on a generic word & appear for the brand, problem is you don't know which keyword triggered it.
DisclaimerThis communication contains information which is confidential and/or maybe privileged. All information contained herein is without prejudice.Blog Moose On The Loose.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks