Hi,
Pretty sure a lot of the same sort of debate will crop up but thought it was interesting how you labelled the options:
Affiliates & Networks & Merchants/Agencies and Affiliates & Merchants/Agencies Only
As thought merchant/agency its one and the same? No affiliate & network & merchant option
anyway, probably just me reading into it too much
id always say these are the main parties and if you want change then these are the ones that need to be involved. Yes networks can educate merchants, but a network rarely knows the precise circumstances of the merchant. From what I know a lots happened *in the background* but from my point of view, 2 years on, nothings changed.
I know some affiliates would vote for an affiliate union, for affiliates, by affiliates with affiliates involved. But surely that just leads to an isolated view of the industry? Someone there would then at any meeting need to play devils advocate for the other parties.
Then what if you get a merchants union, and they all
commission fixing on cheese and milk.
Affiliate marketing’s a powerful tool, but if everyone came together and got a bit more organised it could easily turn into the tool big brands look at first in the run up to any merchants busy season rather than press, tv, google etc