Not chomping Jason... honest... I
am more selective over who I chomp on!
I
am just watching the questions and answers, finding it very interesting. I
am looking forward to see the response to Matts question;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Wood
That said I don't agree with way next have handled the situation and certainly do not agree on what I presume is the instruction by next to not allow 'vocal' affiliates onto the programme.
Fiona can you confirm that it was indeed on the instruction of next head office? or was this an internal i-level decision?
|
And sorry, but I
am being brought into discussion again...
Quote:
|
This is a very good point, however merchants do not pay thousands of pounds a year to customers who voice negative opinions of them.
|
Yes they do! Its called constructive critiscm for crying out loud. They can't expect people to sing the praises of a programme that is complete and utter crap! If they do, then they are worse idiots than I ever imagined! Is anyone actually relaying this information to Next?
A more realistic quote, that I think you should take back to Next management is this;
Affiliates do not generate thousands of pounds for a merchant that will not answer for their actions, that use bully tactics and that generally destroy their own programme. They promote their competition.
Tell them that, and tell them to wake up to reality before it really is too late! Just look at how much damage has already been done and yet still, Next think us affiliates should be appreciative!
They are the laughing stock of the Affiliate Marketing Industry right now! Have you relayed this to Next or are you shielding them from the very horrible truth?