+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 114

 

Thread: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

  1. #61
    www.sctmedia.com

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,443
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts


    I have been looking around google and nothing appears to have changed that I can see.

  2. #62
    Driving to win

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    If I'm not at home, I'm in hospital
    Posts
    7,370
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    I see there are three affiliates bidding on Next as a brand term today - presumably we can expect confirmation from Next/The Networks concerned that all three have had their commissions reversed and been removed from the programme by close of play tomorrow then? - I have made a note of the three affiliates concerned and I will be following this one up - even more disappointing is that one of those taking part is a regular poster on this very forum
    Never argue with idiots. They just drag you down to their level and then beat you with their experience.

    If ignorance is bliss then some of the people I know must be orgasmic.

  3. #63
    www.sctmedia.com

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,443
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
    Looking at the use of the TM term in the ad and the landing page I'd say they are part of a closed group brand bidders.

  4. #64
    Shane's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sheffield - Worldwide Skiver
    Posts
    3,311
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 70 Times in 34 Posts
    I think the important thing to remember is that whilst google are now saying it's ok to bid on any brand term.. nothing has changed with regard to 99% of the merchants out there.. if anything most have tightened up their PPC policies with regard to brand bidding

    so applying the lycra for fat people logic of "just because they make it doesn't mean you should wear it".. then.. just because google say they aren't restricting it anymore doesn't mean you can suddenly start bidding on every merchant's brand terms ..

    you'll still get kicked (ok in reality maybe lightly cuffed with all the power of a kitten attacking a butterfly) if you are caught bidding by the network when the merchant has said you shouldn't. .

  5. #65
    www.sctmedia.com

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,443
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Shane View Post
    I think the important thing to remember is that whilst google are now saying it's ok to bid on any brand term.. nothing has changed with regard to 99% of the merchants out there.. if anything most have tightened up their PPC policies with regard to brand bidding

    so applying the lycra for fat people logic of "just because they make it doesn't mean you should wear it".. then.. just because google say they aren't restricting it anymore doesn't mean you can suddenly start bidding on every merchant's brand terms ..

    you'll still get kicked (ok in reality maybe lightly cuffed with all the power of a kitten attacking a butterfly) if you are caught bidding by the network when the merchant has said you shouldn't. .
    I was origionally referring the the 'dooms day' scenario many claimed in respect to broad matching.

  6. #66
    Driving to win

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    If I'm not at home, I'm in hospital
    Posts
    7,370
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    Steve I would agree with you were I not in possession of the minutes of a teleconference with Next where they clearly state that no affiliate brand bidding is allowed as "it is currently not perceived as adding incremental value" and "If, after 5th May it is determined that affiliate brand bidding is necessary a full RFP will be implemented."

    Given those two statements, I reckon those three affiliates should be thrown off the programme.
    Never argue with idiots. They just drag you down to their level and then beat you with their experience.

    If ignorance is bliss then some of the people I know must be orgasmic.

  7. #67
    www.sctmedia.com

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,443
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by drivetowin View Post
    Steve I would agree with you were I not in possession of the minutes of a teleconference with Next where they clearly state that no affiliate brand bidding is allowed as "it is currently not perceived as adding incremental value" and "If, after 5th May it is determined that affiliate brand bidding is necessary a full RFP will be implemented."

    Given those two statements, I reckon those three affiliates should be thrown off the programme.
    Fair enough, they would have had me fooled especially with so many programs that do not declare if they have closed groups.

  8. #68
    Super Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,313
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Terms is terms re merchants aff programs and nothing changes for affiliates, if you are in a merchants program and they say PPC restrictions still apply then thats the rules of that merchant. Shane nail on the head, what I can guage is that PPC policy has been tightened up across our clients where by they have a restricted ppc policy.

    To be honest Im more worried about the google dependency for small businesses and affiliates and as always would encorage people to imagine if google fell over tomorrow and where would you go to aquire traffic and start working on that.

    I see MSN and Yahoo are not getting it on.. its not like msn cant afford the asking price.
    btw I think they should call it YAMS.com

  9. #69
    Mike_M's Avatar
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    536
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
    Aren't merchants who have suddenly tightened up their PPC policies just shooting themselves in the foot?

    All it takes is for one merchant in the same sector to allow brand bidding, and every affiliate and his dog will be promoting them instead.

  10. #70
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    62
    Thanked 109 Times in 82 Posts
    Nice to have an early example of a clear example of affiliates asking for trouble - my guess is that in a month's time there will be a few more.

    Once again we will see that the playing field is anything but level for some. An interesting test for the resolve of the networks and merchants should follow as we can publicly monitor what happens. What's next in store?!

  11. #71
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    145
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    I have just conducted a small test on some trial keywords, and have been informed that "A trademarked term is preventing your ad from showing."

    So it would appear that trademarks are still preventing ads appearing!

    The trademark is a very well protected one for this trial. Disney

  12. #72
    loquax's Avatar
    www.onelittleduck.co.uk

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    2,802
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 160 Times in 91 Posts
    Looks like the big switch on has happened... seeing ads on Dixons, Currys.. and even our own trademark.

    Jason
    Stuff That Ducks Do.. Working | Blogging | Duck Twitter | Loquax Twitter

  13. #73
    Shane's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sheffield - Worldwide Skiver
    Posts
    3,311
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 70 Times in 34 Posts
    aye check out the finance terms.. the likes of egg, mbna, virgin, barclaycard etc. are awash with ads, mostly poor ones.. although some are running with the trademark term in the ad too

    my fave so far :

    ™ Egg Loan
    Egg ™ "100% Loan"
    Fundslender Secured Loans...
    www.egg.com.loans.com

    going to fundslender.co.uk/egg.html ... perhaps a good case for passing off .. is seriously bad advert.. has TM in it twice. mentions egg 3 times and doesn't even go to the display domain...

    am sure things will settle a bit.. Google will no doubt turn the screw up over the coming weeks and months to wring ever last cent of value from every click

  14. #74
    KirstyM's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    On World Tour!
    Posts
    1,382
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 49 Times in 38 Posts
    I don't think Google has completely put the changes out through the system yet either. I created an ad for some Chloe products yesterday and its still not showing due to Trademarking issues (although I am seeing some more ads on that term today).

    I guess we will see the impact on the big name, high traffic volume brands first. Google will no doubt make sure those are all up and running with oodles of lucrative ads ASAP.
    Please Read My Affiliate Marketing Blog. & consider joining The Affiliate Lending Team - help entrepreneurs in 3rd world countries - all the cool affiliates are doing it

  15. #75
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    145
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Shane View Post
    aye check out the finance terms.. the likes of egg, mbna, virgin, barclaycard etc. are awash with ads, mostly poor ones.. although some are running with the trademark term in the ad too

    my fave so far :

    ™ Egg Loan
    Egg ™ "100% Loan"
    Fundslender Secured Loans...
    www.egg.com.loans.com

    going to fundslender.co.uk/egg.html ... perhaps a good case for passing off .. is seriously bad advert.. has TM in it twice. mentions egg 3 times and doesn't even go to the display domain...

    am sure things will settle a bit.. Google will no doubt turn the screw up over the coming weeks and months to wring ever last cent of value from every click
    The Egg term could be keyword insertion. I'm see a John Lewis ad on the term Disney with the word disney as the title!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Affiliate Redirected Products in Google Base
    By DanielCoe in forum Affiliate Marketing Lounge
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 27-02-08, 05:32 AM
  2. Google Sued Over Adwords
    By PitBoss in forum Affiliate Marketing Lounge
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-02-04, 02:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
To Top

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2