Affiliate Marketing
Forum Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (4) Thread Tools Display Modes

  #61 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
bapages's Avatar
www.sctmedia.com
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,000
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
bapages seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

I have been looking around google and nothing appears to have changed that I can see.
__________________
Steve, Reviews | Fashion | Cars | Travel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
drivetowin's Avatar
Driving to win
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: If I'm not at home, I'm in hospital
Posts: 7,384
Thanks: 6
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
drivetowin seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

I see there are three affiliates bidding on Next as a brand term today - presumably we can expect confirmation from Next/The Networks concerned that all three have had their commissions reversed and been removed from the programme by close of play tomorrow then? - I have made a note of the three affiliates concerned and I will be following this one up - even more disappointing is that one of those taking part is a regular poster on this very forum
__________________
Never argue with idiots. They just drag you down to their level and then beat you with their experience.

If ignorance is bliss then some of the people I know must be orgasmic.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
bapages's Avatar
www.sctmedia.com
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,000
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
bapages seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

Looking at the use of the TM term in the ad and the landing page I'd say they are part of a closed group brand bidders.
__________________
Steve, Reviews | Fashion | Cars | Travel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
Shane's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: sheffield - Worldwide Skiver
Posts: 3,183
Thanks: 8
Thanked 48 Times in 20 Posts
Shane seems to know their stuffShane seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

I think the important thing to remember is that whilst google are now saying it's ok to bid on any brand term.. nothing has changed with regard to 99% of the merchants out there.. if anything most have tightened up their PPC policies with regard to brand bidding

so applying the lycra for fat people logic of "just because they make it doesn't mean you should wear it".. then.. just because google say they aren't restricting it anymore doesn't mean you can suddenly start bidding on every merchant's brand terms ..

you'll still get kicked (ok in reality maybe lightly cuffed with all the power of a kitten attacking a butterfly) if you are caught bidding by the network when the merchant has said you shouldn't. .
__________________
Shane
Dreamweaver Templates I RevenueAddict I BrandWatcher
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
bapages's Avatar
www.sctmedia.com
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,000
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
bapages seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
I think the important thing to remember is that whilst google are now saying it's ok to bid on any brand term.. nothing has changed with regard to 99% of the merchants out there.. if anything most have tightened up their PPC policies with regard to brand bidding

so applying the lycra for fat people logic of "just because they make it doesn't mean you should wear it".. then.. just because google say they aren't restricting it anymore doesn't mean you can suddenly start bidding on every merchant's brand terms ..

you'll still get kicked (ok in reality maybe lightly cuffed with all the power of a kitten attacking a butterfly) if you are caught bidding by the network when the merchant has said you shouldn't. .
I was origionally referring the the 'dooms day' scenario many claimed in respect to broad matching.
__________________
Steve, Reviews | Fashion | Cars | Travel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
drivetowin's Avatar
Driving to win
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: If I'm not at home, I'm in hospital
Posts: 7,384
Thanks: 6
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
drivetowin seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

Steve I would agree with you were I not in possession of the minutes of a teleconference with Next where they clearly state that no affiliate brand bidding is allowed as "it is currently not perceived as adding incremental value" and "If, after 5th May it is determined that affiliate brand bidding is necessary a full RFP will be implemented."

Given those two statements, I reckon those three affiliates should be thrown off the programme.
__________________
Never argue with idiots. They just drag you down to their level and then beat you with their experience.

If ignorance is bliss then some of the people I know must be orgasmic.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
bapages's Avatar
www.sctmedia.com
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,000
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
bapages seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

Quote:
Originally Posted by drivetowin View Post
Steve I would agree with you were I not in possession of the minutes of a teleconference with Next where they clearly state that no affiliate brand bidding is allowed as "it is currently not perceived as adding incremental value" and "If, after 5th May it is determined that affiliate brand bidding is necessary a full RFP will be implemented."

Given those two statements, I reckon those three affiliates should be thrown off the programme.
Fair enough, they would have had me fooled especially with so many programs that do not declare if they have closed groups.
__________________
Steve, Reviews | Fashion | Cars | Travel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,314
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
jess1 seems to know their stuff
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

Terms is terms re merchants aff programs and nothing changes for affiliates, if you are in a merchants program and they say PPC restrictions still apply then thats the rules of that merchant. Shane nail on the head, what I can guage is that PPC policy has been tightened up across our clients where by they have a restricted ppc policy.

To be honest Im more worried about the google dependency for small businesses and affiliates and as always would encorage people to imagine if google fell over tomorrow and where would you go to aquire traffic and start working on that.

I see MSN and Yahoo are not getting it on.. its not like msn cant afford the asking price.
btw I think they should call it YAMS.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 434
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Mike_M is an unknown quantity at this point
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

Aren't merchants who have suddenly tightened up their PPC policies just shooting themselves in the foot?

All it takes is for one merchant in the same sector to allow brand bidding, and every affiliate and his dog will be promoting them instead.
__________________
ISawItOnTheBox.com..........Affiliate Marketing School
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
confuscius is an unknown quantity at this point
  Re: Google Revises Trademark Trigger Policy

Nice to have an early example of a clear example of affiliates asking for trouble - my guess is that in a month's time there will be a few more.

Once again we will see that the playing field is anything but level for some. An interesting test for the resolve of the networks and merchants should follow as we can publicly monitor what happens. What's next in store?!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-08