+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 90

 

Thread: New Best Practice Guidelines from IAB for Voucher Code Sites

  1. #16
    KevinEdwards's Avatar
    Super Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    1,328
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 233 Times in 122 Posts


    I believe I speak for all networks signed up to the new T&Cs when I say that it's unrealistic to expect immediate action on implementing this. All networks will need to understand how best to monitor and police the activity as well as giving all voucher code sites the opportunity to audit and then make necessary changes to their sites.

    In order to give some context on this, it's really significant we've achieved a workable consensus on this and marks a further maturity of the industry.
    Kevin Edwards, Strategy Director
    Tel: +44 (20) 7553 0354
    kevin.edwards@affiliatewindow.com
    http://www.iabaffiliatemarketing.com

  2. #17
    loquax's Avatar
    www.onelittleduck.co.uk

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    2,802
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 160 Times in 91 Posts
    All networks will need to understand how best to monitor and police the activity as well as giving all voucher code sites the opportunity to audit and then make necessary changes to their sites
    That's fair enough Kevin, however the one thing I will say having watched the voucher code stuff unfold over the last 18 months or so is that it does seem that those who perhaps weren't whiter than white (and we're talking iframes, 1x1 codes, forced clicks etc) essentially get the chance to clean up their act without any real repercussions.

    Imo there are affiliates out there - prominent ones at that - who's activity in this sector has been nowt short of disgraceful - yet networks remain keen to work with them.

    It does make me think, having been doing this for far too long now, that being a very naughty boy for a few years and making a few quid is a lot more productive than perhaps playing according to ts&cs (although knowing my luck and the fact we get pulled up for non-important things by some networks we'd get caught and kicked off).

    Anyway that bitterness aside, I'm really pleased the IAB and networks have got together in this way - it's a massive step forward.

    Jason
    Stuff That Ducks Do.. Working | Blogging | Duck Twitter | Loquax Twitter

  3. #18
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    48
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ep90 View Post
    There's more detailed information here:
    • Voucher code directories must contain clear categorization and separation between deals/offers/sales and discount codes.
    I might be misunderstanding something here (and it wouldn't be the first time) but is there a difference between 'voucher codes' and 'discount codes'?

  4. #19
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    438
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts
    I agree with UKjay the guidelines seems to lacking some clarity.

    For example what is the definition of "Voucher code affiliate". Also does "Voucher code directories", mean any site that lists voucher codes, discount codes, and promotional codes?

    What constitutes "clear categorization and separation between deals/offers/sales and discount codes."

  5. #20
    Coffee Drinker

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South UK
    Posts
    445
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by confuscius View Post
    Why are the 'networks' waiting until the new year to implement this?

    Why not action the plan now?
    Quote Originally Posted by KevinEdwards View Post
    .....it's unrealistic to expect immediate action on implementing this. .....giving all voucher code sites the opportunity to audit and then make necessary changes to their sites.....
    So Am I to understand that if an imaginary affiliate - let's call him Mark, was still operating a site that operated CTR where there is no valid code on the 1st of Jan, then he'd find himself removed from all of the networks signed up to the IAB?


    TTFN

    BFG

  6. #21
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    461
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew Wood View Post
    I also note that Affiliate Future, POR and OMG are missing from the list?
    Paid On Results are currently not members of the IAB AMC for various reasons although we are happy to co-operate where we believe it will benefit the industry. We have a long history of doing the right thing for this industry and prefer to make our own choices when it comes to policy.

    Everything that's been said by AMC is standard practice at Paid On Results, covered in our Affiliate terms. You must even tick 4 boxes before you can join as an Affiliate and one of these states "You agree not to mislead potential customers or partners in any way." Paid On Results however feel this is not the total solution and we have been working on and developing a fuller solution that we hope to release soon.

    It is good news that the other Networks are banning practices like "click to reveal" when no code is present - we already do this and will take action against anyone who uses this method.

    Paid On Results didn't allow spyware from the inception of our network and we terminated anyone involved in spyware without any razzmatazz because we considered this the right thing to do. The present situation sounds a bit like how spyware was handled in the past, which was tolerated albeit unofficially, due to the income it generated. Here again there has been a reluctance to do the right thing earlier, possibly due to potential loss of income. This lack of earlier action by Networks has led to confusion among Affiliates who see others benefitting, so they decide to follow suit and this mess now has to be undone.

    When we release our solution we will be happy for other Networks to use their version, yes that's right we don't mind as long as people know it was a Paid On Results solution.

  7. #22
    Coffee Drinker

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South UK
    Posts
    445
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by paidonresults View Post
    When we release our solution we will be happy for other Networks to use their version

    Not quite sure I understand.
    Your solution to what?
    You mean you aren't happy for other networks to use there own version (version of what?) right now?


    TTFN

    BFG

  8. #23
    Affiliate

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,200
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 36 Times in 27 Posts
    I would be interested to know what voucher code affiliates were involved in the meetings, the quote on the IAB website states

    "This has been a collaborative process between voucher code affiliates, merchants, agencies and networks, all working towards instilling best practice throughout the industry"

    2nd point, does this guideline mean the end to CTR or just CTR when no valid code
    Follow, My Affiliate Marketing Musing on . http://www.twitter.com/purple

  9. #24
    Supercod's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland, UK.
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 26 Times in 12 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BFG 9000 View Post
    Not quite sure I understand.
    Your solution to what?
    You mean you aren't happy for other networks to use there own version (version of what?) right now?
    We feel that terms alone do not solve the issues that merchants, agencies and affiliates see as the problems and it needs a more complete approach however terms are important and everything towards the end goal is a good step.

    As I said we will not mind if Networks see what we come up with and decided to use a version of this themselves, but at this point I will not be drawn on these as too much time, money, research and planning has gone in to this for us to give it away in the last stages.
    Clarke - On Twitter @ClarkeDuncan

    Check out my Blog at www.affiliatemarketingblog.co.uk

  10. #25
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,998
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 144 Times in 103 Posts
    As an affiliate in the voucher code arena I was at the meeting aswell as others. The IAB resolution in my view was hugely wanted and needed. It was quite simply a resolution that can be implmented easily by most networks and affiliates.

    In the past there were no rules and people ran a mock, the idea is that the IAB now start implementing some guidelines. But those people who ran a mock cannot be penalised if there were no rules and they just saw an opportunity.

    The intent is quite simple to make things clean. These are early days.

    Doug

  11. #26
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    438
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts
    Yes I too would be interested to hear which "vocher code affiliates" were involved in the meetings.

    Doug you were there, can you tell us?

  12. #27
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,998
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 144 Times in 103 Posts
    Not my place to say, but I can tell you that the ones you would expect were invited and some were represented

    The issues the IAB are trying to fix are at present fairly basic. My concern was quite simple I did not want to be breaking the law by saying I was offering something that I did not have.

    Doug

  13. #28
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    419
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by confuscius View Post
    Why are the 'networks' waiting until the new year to implement this?

    Why not action the plan now?

    They want their overide on xmas sales

  14. #29
    Affiliate

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,200
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 36 Times in 27 Posts
    so is CTR to be outlawed or only when there is no valid code behind it?
    Follow, My Affiliate Marketing Musing on . http://www.twitter.com/purple

  15. #30
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,998
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 144 Times in 103 Posts
    CTR when no valid code...is my understanding

    Maybe they want the Christmas sales think its so they can actually give the people whow do not conform time to conform....it seems fair to me

    Doug

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Webgains Weekly Merchant Offers
    By gmachado in forum Webgains
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-11-08, 04:46 PM
  2. Voucher Code Update - Full List (5/11/08)
    By Dave@Profitistic in forum Other Networks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-11-08, 11:04 AM
  3. Webgains weekly merchant offers
    By gmachado in forum Webgains
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 30-10-08, 10:10 AM
  4. Webgains Weekly Updated Offers
    By Emma Delaforce in forum Webgains
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-04-08, 07:56 PM
  5. Publisher Code of Conduct - Revised and Restated
    By Chris Clarkson in forum Commission Junction
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 14-08-04, 09:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
To Top

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2