I don't agree with this at all Andrew. Sky have the absolute right to direct specific offers to specific partners based on where they think those offers will resonate and where the greatest return will come from. This is not particular to affiliate marketing, this has happened since time began across the board. Different supermarkets are able to command different rates and therefore provide different offers to consumers. They appreciate that by building relationships and being able to drive volume leads to economies of scale, which translate into better consumer offers.
Within the affiliate channel, there are numerous different methods that affiliates use and these need to be leveraged in different ways to elicit the greatest return for the merchant. Without discussing the Sky campaign specifically (as I don't know a lot about it), let me give you an example. A high volume comparison site may be offered a better commission or consumer offer in order to differentiate it from a competitor. As long as this still makes commercial sense for the merchant this isn't unfair on other people, it is simply good marketing practice. They are reducing their own margin to drive more sales.
Clearly it is more cost and resource effective for Sky to concentrate on running these offers with those partners who have the capability and desire to work closely with them and drive more sales.
The deduplication issue is completely separate to this and something I
am incapable of commenting on.
Bookmarks