1. #1
    Julia Stent is an unknown quantity at this point Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    159
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Affiliate Keyword Agreement

    Since the announcements regarding the Google trademark policy change that will come into place on May 5th, there has been a lot of industry discussion surrounding the effect that this will have on merchants. This has been a key focus for Affiliate Window over the course of the last week and we have been in talks with a number of parties regarding the best course of action to advise. Our primary opinion is that every advertisers’ paid search strategy should be considered on a case-by-case basis, and a standardised cross-network solution would not be the best way forward. However, we will be releasing an analysis of how this change will affect the affiliate channel and presenting different options available to advertisers early next week.

    It is our opinion that while all discussions to date have focused on merchants, the effect that this will have on an affiliate’s own brand space may have been overlooked. Affiliates who have a trademarked brand have just as much potential cause for concern as merchants. Whether an affiliate’s brand search terms are trademarked or not, all affiliates can benefit from a decrease in competition for consumers looking specifically for their site. This ultimately will free up paid search funds from increased CPCs on brand terms to be invested into merchant campaigns, benefiting both the affiliate’s profitability and the industry as a whole.

    Affiliate Window would like to initiate a reciprocal keyword agreement between affiliates. This will be in the form of a self-policing ‘gentleman’s agreement’ that when taking part in this scheme, affiliates will not bid on the specified brand terms of other members of the group.

    We would like to suggest that as a first step, affiliates refrain from bidding on the URLs of the other parties. For example, were Affiliate Window to take part, our list of terms would include:

    Code:
    www.affiliatewindow.com
    www.affiliatewindow.co.uk
    affiliatewindow.com
    affiliatewindow.co.uk
    This could extend to as many sites as the party owns, so for example we could additionally include ShopWindow.com.

    Due to the generic nature of many affiliate brands, I feel it would be difficult to roll this out to include exact match brand terms. For example, there are a number of affiliates whose brands include ‘code’, ‘voucher’, etc so this would potentially be problematic. However, I would like to open this up to debate and welcome your suggestions on how this could move forwards.

    Initially, it would be great to hear your feedback and also for any affiliates wishing to take part to list their URLs in the format mentioned above. You will then see openly on this thread which other affiliates are taking part. Affiliate Window will also compile a list of these URL terms once membership develops sufficiently so this can sent out to new members of the group.

    If you would like to discuss this with me directly, I’d be happy to talk it through with you. You can reach me on 020 7553 0355, julia.stent@hotmail.com or MSN Messenger: jrstent@hotmail.com.

    Looking forward to hearing your thoughts

    Thanks

    Julia
    Julia Stent - Client Strategist Affiliate Window
    Email:- julia.stent@affiliatewindow.com MSN:- jrstent@hotmail.com Phone:- 020 7553 0355

  2. #2
    MarkCo is an unknown quantity at this point Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    371
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Hi Julia,

    I think this is a great idea. I currently DO bid on some my affiliate competitor brand names, and am happy to cancel this if these sites / affiliates become in involved in this group agreement.

    Will be interesting to see if of the bidders on my terms join ;-)

  3. #3
    getvisible getvisible's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    My Neighbour is Elvis
    Posts
    4,557
    Thanks
    130
    Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkCo View Post
    I think this is a great idea. I currently DO bid on some my affiliate competitor brand names, and am happy to cancel this if these sites / affiliates become in involved in this group agreement.
    and SEO for them in a totally arrogant manner!

    I've never bid on other affiliate's brand names - or seo'd for any other affiliate's trademarked terms so it would'nt have much impact on me.

    I do think there needs to be a greater level of respect between affiliates, there may be rogue ones, but I wonder how likely some affiliates would be to added their domains into the list seeing as it could just become a "pinch list" :cry

    I'd be interested how much bidding there is own other affiliate's brands.
    Do you have products for review on my chocolate reviews or Easter eggs blog?s PM me.

  4. #4
    Bud
    Bud is offline
    Bud Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    933
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 50 Times in 35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by getvisible View Post
    I've never bid on other affiliate's brand names - or seo'd for any other affiliate's trademarked terms so it would have much impact on me.
    I completely agree with you Lee - same applies for me.

    I've always took this to be an 'unwritten' rule anyway and seems like common courtesy.

    Being slightly cycnical though, it has to be said that:

    While I applaud this thread/line of thought, and fully support the idea, there has been much discussion on here previously about dubious methods of promotion and it seems that very little action has ever been taken when merchants/networks were reaping the rewards.
    Now it's more likely to affect them directly, concern is raised.


    You can rest assured I won't be bidding on others TM's or 'property', but I won't be losing any sleep about those who suffer as a result of anyone who does. Failure to punish while the 'sun was shining' for merchants will no doubt lead to more dubious behaviour with this change.
    Bud

    Great Shopping That Doesn't Cost The Earth: www.TheOffsetShop.co.uk
    "Will Dance for Discount Codes!"

  5. #5
    Julia Stent is an unknown quantity at this point Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    159
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Hi Bud / Lee

    I completely understand both of your points and applaud the approach of respecting other affiliates' brands. However I feel that as this practise does currently exist, it is worth trying to address.

    I actually started trying to get this in place at the end of last year and was working with a few affiliates on a trial basis, so I wouldn't want affiliates to think this has been a reactionary move. I'm happy to say there was a great response back then and I would hope the affiliates who worked with me at that stage would put themselves forward for this now. I was looking to launch it publicly at the time but very quickly Christmas was upon us and this got put to one side.

    I've seen the introduction of the Google policy change as an opportunity to revisit this idea while the issue is front of mind for affiliates. I understand your point that not every affiliate does bid on other brands or would do so after May 5th - from my point of view, this could be an opportunity for those affiliates to publicly state that fact and go some way to encouraging others to do the same.

    As I stated originally, this was an attempt to initiate a discussion from affiliates rather than to introduce any kind of network policy. Participation is entirely optional, and I leave it at each affiliate's discretion to decide whether this is suitable for them.

    Thanks

    Julia
    Julia Stent - Client Strategist Affiliate Window
    Email:- julia.stent@affiliatewindow.com MSN:- jrstent@hotmail.com Phone:- 020 7553 0355

  6. #6
    Rich is an unknown quantity at this point Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,453
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Surely if some affiliate wanted to bid on my brand term then they just wouldn't join the scheme? You seem to be saying that if they don't join the scheme that the affiliates that are part of it could bid on their terms, but the affiliates that are part of the agreement probably don't what to bid on other affiliates brand terms and, quite likely, the affiliate that doesn't what to take part wouldn't have have traffic to his terms worth bidding on anyway.

    There doesn't seem to be a disadvantage to not taking part but to take part you have to advertise your most important brands. I'm not one that worries about hiding sites, but I don't shout about some of them and I know others are more wary.

  7. #7
    renegade renegade Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,509
    Thanks
    280
    Thanked 129 Times in 53 Posts
    Hi Julia,
    I know from our earlier conversations your/AW's intentions and honourable but I think the agreement is doomed to failure simply because it's a gentlemans agreement.

    I've never bid or SEOed any of our sites to rank on any rivals sitenames (trademarked or not) and I'm happy to publically declare that I would only ever consider doing so if I found a site abusing the mutual respect most long-standing affiliates have always had for each other.

    One the few occasions I have found sites bidding on our sitenames I've found the best way to resolve the problem has been to approach the site owner directly.

    Sites which have fallen foul of this previously unwritten agreement between established affiliates will naturally see this agreement in a more positive light in an effort to get a monkey or two off their backs but for people like myself there's no benefit to participating and to that extent I share Lee and Buds reservations.

    A mandatory agreement enforced across affiliates and networks would be cool but in reality it isn't ever going to happen so having declared my non-agression pact with the rest of the affiliate world for now I'm content to fight my own battles.

    Perhaps public declarations like mine would be an alternative way forward?

  8. #8
    ian-d Merchant User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    1,432
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
    Maybe i'm not fully understanding the change (or skimmed the thread ) but google's policy change doesn't alter a lot. Fair enough it now gives 'anyone' the opportunity to use previously blocked trademark words in a ppc campaign, but if the merchant company has always had a list of 'do not bid' words, then surely nothing changes, it continues to be policed by the network and the merchant.

    I don't see much changing, i fully the support the restrictions put on url and trademark/company names, but for some, these have always been in place.

    Can appreciate AWin's prompt consideration of this policy change, its admirable to be looking at this possible? issue before the time comes, thumbs up

  9. #9
    hpops hpops Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,410
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked 149 Times in 72 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ian-d View Post

    Can appreciate AWin's prompt consideration of this policy change, its admirable to be looking at this possible? issue before the time comes, thumbs up
    I totally agree - its an interesting move in the current climatae and certainly smells considerably nicer than the "we're experts in closed groups" scent coming from elsewhere - Julia, can you pop me your series of recommendations when done please. :tup
    TotalSearchSolutions now providing Affiliate Management services as well as Search Engine Marketing and optimisation.

    www.totalsearchsolutions.co.uk

  10. #10
    Shane Shane Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sheffield - Worldwide Skiver
    Posts
    3,314
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 69 Times in 33 Posts
    yup for sure Awin seem to be the only network that's actually trying to think in front of the impending changes and look at the range of scenarios it presents in the context of how it will affect merchants, affiliates and networks AND not just solely with the aim of milking the hell out of panic stricken merchants by shovelling them towards brand bidding groups as the only solution.

    The usual suspects on the other hand seem to be very quiet on this .. no doubt they are too busy striking the fear of god into merchants and ringing round the BBG's they have on speed dial to have everything in place for maximum exploitation come May the 5th

    thumbs up to Awin.. back handed biatch slap to the rest

  11. #11
    loquax loquax's Avatar www.onelittleduck.co.uk
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Swansea
    Posts
    2,723
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 119 Times in 62 Posts
    I'm happy to publically declare that I would only ever consider doing so if I found a site abusing the mutual respect most long-standing affiliates have always had for each other
    I'll follow suit with Joe and agree to a similar position.

    We're fully expecting to see competitor ads (affiliates or merchants) on our trademark searches come 5th May - and really can only assess the impact after that date. It may well be those ads don't do anything in terms of traffic/revenue.

    Our intention currently is not to go into PPC bidding on competitors sitenames or trademarks...

    Jason
    Stuff That Ducks Do.. Working | Blogging | Duck Twitter | Loquax Twitter

  12. #12
    befuddle is an unknown quantity at this point befuddle's Avatar Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    1,052
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 51 Times in 37 Posts
    I am happy to be a part of this agreement

    Code:
    www.shopcodes.co.uk
    www.shopcodes.com
    shopcodes.co.uk
    shopcodes.com

  13. #13
    Julia Stent is an unknown quantity at this point Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    159
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Hi guys

    Thanks to everyone for their input on this. I think getting additional opinions on this has been good for spotting a number of points that didn't come up when I trialled this on a smaller scale, for example:

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    There doesn't seem to be a disadvantage to not taking part but to take part you have to advertise your most important brands. I'm not one that worries about hiding sites, but I don't shout about some of them and I know others are more wary.
    Let's put me not spotting that down to my optimisim in the good nature of affiliates...

    Perhaps there are two ways forward with this. For well-known sites that aren't open to the problem of revealing their brands they can show their involvement here, like Mark and Ray. Other affiliates who don't want to do that could instead use this as an opportunity to publicly state that they won't bid on competitor brands.

    Hopefully this will act as an encouragement both to those who already do this and new affiliates entering the market to refrain from competitor bidding. Although there is a long-standing unspoken agreement between those who have been in the industry for a long time, I suspect there are new affiliates who don't know about this idea or haven't considered the effect they're having on other businesses who would be happy to follow suit.

    As always, happy to have a chat about this - 020 7533 0355 / MSN: jrstent@hotmail.com

    Cheers

    Julia
    Julia Stent - Client Strategist Affiliate Window
    Email:- julia.stent@affiliatewindow.com MSN:- jrstent@hotmail.com Phone:- 020 7553 0355

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Euroffice.co.uk Affiliate Newsletter Sept 2007
    By Jon@euroffice in forum TradeDoubler
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31-08-07, 05:50 PM
  2. Get Ready for the Big Gambling Affiliate Takeover
    By ChrisBishop in forum Affiliate Marketing Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26-06-07, 04:33 PM
  3. LoveHoney.co.uk
    By jess1 in forum Affiliate Future
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 17-04-07, 02:59 PM
  4. Affiliate HealthCheck launch
    By affiliatehealth in forum Affiliate Marketing Lounge
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-03-07, 03:18 PM
  5. Speakeasy 2006 - Only a few places left!
    By Warrick Lambert in forum buy.at
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-05-06, 12:37 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2