Thanks for the responses.
If the point wasn't clear sorry, maybe I was carried away.
Yes any affiliate must abide by the T&C's and any responsible affiliate should comply with the network request and so forth.
A merchant is within their right to ask for whatever they want; the question is whether the request is reasonable and secondarily whether it is effective.
My point was that the current situation and the escalating requests are not reasonable nor effective. tesco1 is happily bringing in the search and generic traffic for Tesco codes while making adsense on the side, CPM's would work equally well. It's easy to monetise traffic for Tesco codes just NOT using affiliate links. As said, if you don't like the affiliate agreement go elsewhere - and many have been happy to do so.
The fact is that many people are making money on Tesco codes without any problems and will continue to do so. Whether Tesco doesn't like it or not is irrelevant - they have an open system for codes, the codes are in public domain and not restricted from general use. I strongly doubt we will see Tesco stopping myspace ads for example because people are sharing common Tesco codes in their profiles.
Tesco have made a choice on their end in the way they handle codes. They even have the technical ability to limit codes to certain accounts (as they have done now and then). Many many many merchants, in fact the large majority, have NO issues with improper voucher code usage because they control code usage on their end responsibly. If Tesco have problems they should be solving the issue themselves instead of expecting a marketing channel to do it for them.
My argument is not from a publisher perspective it's from an industry perspective. From a publisher perspective, as noted, there is no problem monetising these general use codes and in fact the limited market due to the absence of affiliates can make it more lucrative than other options. The argument is that this is an industry issue which networks should be approaching responsibly and reasonably rather than just buying the merchant explanation and pushing that line.
The networks need to understand that this is a merchant issue not a publisher or affiliate issue. If a merchant is having trouble controlling widely available codes that is their technical problem to sort out. Is it possible to stop the affiliate channel from publishing codes? Probably. However what are they going to do with the cpm channel? or the adsense channels? or people sharing on social networks with no monetisation to themselves?
Quote:
|
We still expect all affiliates on the buy.at network to maintain a professional approach to this and represent our industry with proper conduct and stick to the T&C’s of the program.
|
That should go without saying and certainly that affiliates take this quietly shows that they are probably only too happy to work with merchants even when their demands are ridiculous. A professional approach would probably look quite different to that...