123 debt solutions now on affiliate future too !

[smingle]

Tweet

AffiliateFuture.com

I didn't see that coming Lee ?

Well done, about time we saw an honest and above board merchant, on the finance channel and on a recognised network :tup Lead rates on AF are alot lower though ?

Keep up the good work

[123debtsolutions]

Hi Smingle (Frank)

We like to surprise the affiliates. We hope to broaden our reach and expand our affiliate base and thought no better way than with an established and reputable network.

Early days but AF have been great and seem to be very strong in the affiliate world. Time will tell.

You're right the payout is lower than our own in house program but there are a number of reasons for this and I think they are fairly obvious.

For anyone who wants to sign up they can visit : 123 DS joins Affiliate Future

[abc]

Smart move Lee

Well Done.. Nice to see business's growing in especially such troubled times..

Good gameplay..

Rick

[Buzz-Media]

I purchased secured loan leads from Rick month in month out..Never once had any issues.

I think there is one big advantage of using Rick/ABC - He can't hide behind smoke screens like many others do.

IMO Rick is a stand up guy - Seems very harsh that you decided to rip him off..

[abc]

I purchased secured loan leads from Rick month in month out..Never once had any issues.

I think there is one big advantage of using Rick/ABC - He can't hide behind smoke screens like many others do.

IMO Rick is a stand up guy - Seems very harsh that you decided to rip him off..

LEE 123 did not rip me off.. it was on another thread lol Lee Plaister..

thanks for backing me up though m8y..

LEE 123 is a cool dude..

Rick

[drivetowin]

You're right the payout is lower than our own in house program but there are a number of reasons for this and I think they are fairly obvious.

True, but aren't you trying to pull the wool over the eyes a bit.

Affiliate Future's override will be at most 30% so taking your normal commissions of £39 for a debt management lead and £100 for an IVA you could afford to pay £30 for a debt management and £77 for an IVA and be no worse off - which is significantly better than your offer of £22 for debt management and £30 for IVA - £30 for IVA is frankly taking the Michael and that's no reference to MA either

[Buzz-Media]

I didn't mean Lee from 123..That Lee is a stand up bloke...

[123debtsolutions]

True, but aren't you trying to pull the wool over the eyes a bit.

Affiliate Future's override will be at most 30% so taking your normal commissions of £39 for a debt management lead and £100 for an IVA you could afford to pay £30 for a debt management and £77 for an IVA and be no worse off - which is significantly better than your offer of £22 for debt management and £30 for IVA - £30 for IVA is frankly taking the Michael and that's no reference to MA either

Sorry for the delay, I had the page open yesterday and didn’t get a chance to respond.

Tough to word my response without offending anyone. Im gonna start by saying that the
123 program encourages "Introducers" rather than "Affiliates". The main difference between the 2 is that an introducers job is to introduce business to the merchant/network by generating quality leads/enquiries using SEO/PPC techniques. This is usually done by developing a specific standalone site. (They also need a lot of time, research, skill, luck, money, etc, etc...)

The above is a very difficult task and to my knowledge only about 30-50 of you on this forum are actually any good at it... (Another 50 of you have potential but are in the championship rather than premiership, no offence.)
Either way an introducer deserves the highest possible return on investment.

An affiliate is what "Affiliate Future" attracts. An affiliate is someone who signs up with a merchant of their choice, places a banner/button/text link/skyscraper etc into their existing web pages and sits back and waits for traffic in the hope that enough people "Click" the advert. Once the advert is clicked the user is faced with the merchants web site. If the merchants web site sells the product/service to the client then the "Affiliate" is paid a rewarding fee.

The above is an easy task and a network like AF claims to have some of the very best affiliates in UK.

Now my question to you having worked with you for some months and bearing in mind I place you in the premiership of introducers. Do you truly believe that affiliates should be paid the same as an introducer?

For what it's worth im playing devil’s advocate with you here. As I personally believe that we should pay more to affiliates and indeed this will definitely happen in the near future, however you should also remember that we have only just joined an affiliate network and until results are proven we can't pay the same fees as we do introducers.
There is also a number of other factors to take into account such as the other programs available and the network fees etc.

The long and short of it is there is no wool being pulled over anyone’s eyes. The program launched by 123 on the AF network is one of the best "Debt Help" programs on the network and in only 3 days has so far seen some very, very encouraging signs and if we achieve current estimated targets there will be no doubt an increased payout for performing affiliates.

[smingle]

Sorry for the delay, I had the page open yesterday and didn’t get a chance to respond.

Tough to word my response without offending anyone. Im gonna start by saying that the
123 program encourages "Introducers" rather than "Affiliates". The main difference between the 2 is that an introducers job is to introduce business to the merchant/network by generating quality leads/enquiries using SEO/PPC techniques. This is usually done by developing a specific standalone site. (They also need a lot of time, research, skill, luck, money, etc, etc...)

The above is a very difficult task and to my knowledge only about 30-50 of you on this forum are actually any good at it... (Another 50 of you have potential but are in the championship rather than premiership, no offence.)
Either way an introducer deserves the highest possible return on investment.

An affiliate is what "Affiliate Future" attracts. An affiliate is someone who signs up with a merchant of their choice, places a banner/button/text link/skyscraper etc into their existing web pages and sits back and waits for traffic in the hope that enough people "Click" the advert. Once the advert is clicked the user is faced with the merchants web site. If the merchants web site sells the product/service to the client then the "Affiliate" is paid a rewarding fee.

The above is an easy task and a network like AF claims to have some of the very best affiliates in UK.

Now my question to you having worked with you for some months and bearing in mind I place you in the premiership of introducers. Do you truly believe that affiliates should be paid the same as an introducer?

For what it's worth im playing devil’s advocate with you here. As I personally believe that we should pay more to affiliates and indeed this will definitely happen in the near future, however you should also remember that we have only just joined an affiliate network and until results are proven we can't pay the same fees as we do introducers.
There is also a number of other factors to take into account such as the other programs available and the network fees etc.

The long and short of it is there is no wool being pulled over anyone’s eyes. The program launched by 123 on the AF network is one of the best "Debt Help" programs on the network and in only 3 days has so far seen some very, very encouraging signs and if we achieve current estimated targets there will be no doubt an increased payout for performing affiliates.

Which is exactly why I am an introducer

Nice reply Lee :tup