Results 1 to 10 of 10

 

Thread: SEO Penalties based on Copyright Info.

  1. #1
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    48
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


    This is something i've never heard up until today, but does google penalise a website for having a backdated copright mark on the footer?

    I.e. our site has copyright 2001 at the footer and i was led to believe that this will incur a penally for the site.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    getvisible's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    My Neighbour is Elvis
    Posts
    4,559
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 51 Times in 34 Posts
    no .......................
    Do you have products for review on my chocolate reviews or Easter eggs blog?s PM me.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    48
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Great, what i thought.

    That makes the SEO sales call i had from an 'expert' the crappest ever! :td

  4. #4
    DioBach's Avatar
    .com

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tenby, Wales, UK
    Posts
    776
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by artistri View Post
    Great, what i thought.

    That makes the SEO sales call i had from an 'expert' the crappest ever! :td
    If the SEO company is calling you, you can pretty much guarantee they'll be crap anyway!

  5. #5
    tbp
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,998
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
    I have actually heard this before, the "logic" being that if you have a copyright 2001 for example Google think that your site isn't being updated.

    I don't believe this is true though, and haven't seen any evidence of it in my experience.

    The easiest thing is just to have copyright 2001 - 2008 for example. I think it looks good to have the original date as it shows you've been established for a long time which inspires confidence.

    If your pages are dynamic, you can use the PHP date command for example to print the latest year automatically. I do it on all my sites now, so it automatically updates each year and theres no having to go through all my sites changing it.

    I keep my site copyright year updated for appearance though, rather than for Google. I can't see that you would be penalised for it.

  6. #6
    KirstyM's Avatar
    Super Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    On World Tour!
    Posts
    1,382
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 49 Times in 38 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by artistri View Post
    Great, what i thought.

    That makes the SEO sales call i had from an 'expert' the crappest ever! :td
    Pfftt.... just hang up the next time Kev, I used to get them too at Greenfingers. Cheeky, lying, sods!
    Please Read My Affiliate Marketing Blog. & consider joining The Affiliate Lending Team - help entrepreneurs in 3rd world countries - all the cool affiliates are doing it

  7. #7
    Negative SEO is fun!

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,389
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 39 Times in 35 Posts
    >> our site has copyright 2001 at the footer and i was led to believe that this will incur a penally for the site.

    A ridiculous assertion. Google look at a lot of time sensitive data, it's true, but your copyright notice is unlikely to be one of them

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    84
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DioBach View Post
    If the SEO company is calling you, you can pretty much guarantee they'll be crap anyway!
    Yeah I agree..

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Exactly.. good SEO companies dont have time for that sort of thing.

    This is one of the worst SEO myths I've ever heard.. I see sites with copyright 1998 and they're ranking #1 !

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    If this were the case, Microsoft, and their early 90s copyrights would have them ranked pretty low...



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Webgains Merchants List
    By Ryan Gilbert in forum Webgains
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 23-12-10, 11:52 PM
  2. Affiliate Forums, SEO Articles & Dangers For Noobs.
    By Affi Liate in forum Affiliate Marketing Lounge
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 18-04-08, 08:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
To Top

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2